The one sided arguement thatour legal system delivers,with its state legal aid lawyers is all well to found out to be a lie by those that find themselves in the dock.The almighty uncontested psychiatric opinions that prevail as the major law politic, are key here and have never been challenged.
However the answer to this,on a meagre defence council budget does not wield a biros worth of defence against the supercomputers of the state prosecutiuon councils. A very one sided affair.
However the funds/budgeting, if applied, could reverse or turnabout the situation.
If they facilitated footwork and research to cross-check the majority of half truths and dodgy doctor opinions,they would certainly dispel the myth that these High-Priests have any credibillity. A catologue of inperceptions and imaginations would be revealed.And it is not without case, that they are virused minds as anyone else, to deliver delusions ,from errors of Mof society have political assainated their mutant enemies by these well paid dogs ,for far to long.
Those on the wrong side of the law-fence andthose that work with victims of law,know only to well that there is a mountain of misinformation and faulty opinion,which would rock the system to its roots if looked at in this modern time under the new found tool of Information Technology.
This by the very system that convicted, would free a great deal of misdeneamours, whose profile has been amplified to fit criminal atrocity.
I currently conclude that the legal profession does not want to upset the staus quo, and therefore, apparantly, does not want to see justice prevail.No action is being forged ahead, here.

Why dont they make the appropriately large financial investment to sperate these areas of fact and fiction,with the new Information Technology tools?
A machinary that devoted 98% of its resourses to locking people away and less than 2% percent in their defence is a monstrous machinary.
It was never meant to be like this.